usa

Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin Sues NASA Over A Lunar Lander Contract Given To Rival SpaceX

jeff-bezos’-blue-origin-sues-nasa-over-a-lunar-lander-contract-given-to-rival-spacex

Jeff Bezos speaks about his brief space flight on Blue Origin’s New Shepard during a news conference on July 20, in Van Horn, Texas. Blue Origin is suing NASA over a lunar lander contract awarded to rival SpaceX. Joe Raedle/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Jeff Bezos speaks about his brief space flight on Blue Origin’s New Shepard during a news conference on July 20, in Van Horn, Texas. Blue Origin is suing NASA over a lunar lander contract awarded to rival SpaceX.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Jeff Bezos’ ongoing rivalry with SpaceX is heating up. His aerospace company Blue Origin has filed a lawsuit against NASA after the agency awarded a highly coveted contract for a lunar lander to Elon Musk’s SpaceX instead.

Blue Origin has filed a federal suit accusing NASA of having been “unlawful and improper” in its evaluation of proposals concerning its human landing system program, SpaceNews reports.

SpaceX Wins $2.9 Billion Contract For Next Lunar Lander

NASA in April awarded a nearly $2.9 billion contract to SpaceX to collaborate with the agency to design and develop a lunar lander to carry astronauts to the moon — ensuring that SpaceX will likely play a big role in the first lunar landing with humans since 1972.

In July, Blue Origin argued in an open letter that NASA gave SpaceX an unfair advantage during the proposal process. Bezos’ company also said by choosing only one company to receive a contract, the space agency made it possible for one company to possibly “[have] insurmountable leverage over NASA.”

SpaceX's New Rocket Factory Is Making Its Texas Neighbors Mad

Without competition, Blue Origin said, “short-term and long-term lunar ambitions will be delayed, will ultimately cost more, and won’t serve the national interest.”

In the letter, Blue Origin offered to sacrifice up to $2 billion in future payments should NASA amend its decision.

Blue Origin and Dynetics, another private company, filed a formal complaint with the Government Accountability Office over NASA’s decision to work solely with SpaceX.

Pentagon Scraps $10 Billion Contract With Microsoft, Bitterly Contested By Amazon

But the GAO concluded in July that NASA did nothing wrong. NASA stated in its initial announcement that the agency had the option of issuing multiple awards, a single one, or none at all, dependent on funding, GAO said. NASA in the end went with only one company because it didn’t have enough funding for more than one award. The GAO also said that NASA fairly evaluated all proposals.

NASA must respond to Blue Origin’s suit by Oct. 12, according to BBC News. However, the details of the suit will likely remain a mystery; Blue Origin was granted a protective order, sealing details of the case, on Monday, according to Space.com.

Representatives for NASA told The Verge that they are “currently reviewing” the case.

Leave a Reply